<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-09-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1975" />
  <endPage num="2059" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Disciplinary Tribunal</name>
      <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000668">
        <heading>Police Disciplinary Tribunal</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-09-24">
            <name>Police Disciplinary Tribunal</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-09-24T15:16:44" />
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000669">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-24T15:16:44" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (15:16):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Police. What mechanism will replace the functions of the Police Disciplinary Tribunal when it is abolished?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-09-24">
            <name>Police Disciplinary Tribunal</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-09-24T15:16:57" />
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000670">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-24T15:16:57" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (15:16):</by>  I am grateful for the question because it actually raises a very important issue, and that is about probably two or more years ago, if I remember correctly, the minister for police—who at that time was known to us simply as the member, our parliamentary secretary—undertook a very lengthy—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4844">
        <name>Mr BELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000671">
          <by role="member" id="4844">Mr BELL:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker. There is no clock and knowing the minister's words, it could go for 14 minutes, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000672">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Thank you. Our mistake.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000673">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I will assume that was an indirect allusion to me having some similarities with the member for Bragg, and I accept that from that side as a compliment. A while ago the minister undertook a piece of work leading up to the eventual passage last year of legislation to establish a civil and administrative tribunal, which I think everyone in the parliament has agreed is a good idea. That legislation was at the time explained to everybody as being a piece of legislation that would establish a framework, an architecture, and that would eventually be populated over time with different waves of jurisdiction.</text>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000674">The idea was that the first of those waves, which is presently a matter which is going on here, would involve the Guardianship Board and the Residential Tenancies Tribunal. For various reasons that I may or may not be permitted to entertain at the moment, that appears to be stuck in the mud, so conversations about the immediate future of the SACAT have become complicated because of a peculiar coalition of members of the opposition and the crossbenchers.</text>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000675">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000676">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  The interjections are foolish because not only are they out of order but it is a well-known fact to anyone with many fingers and toes that the government does not have a majority of people in the other place, so what goes on in there is actually something over which we have no control.</text>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000677">As to the question about boards and committees, the background to that matter is the Premier made it clear some time ago that the government thought it was appropriate for us to go through a thorough review of boards and committees and to ascertain a number of things. The first of those things was: do we need this at all? The second one was: if it is performing some useful function, need that function be performed by a committee? Could it be performed by some other entity or merged into another entity? Then there are questions of redundancy and various other things.</text>
        <page num="2019" />
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000678">Further to that, the Premier earlier this week released a document. The document was put out there so that there could be an informed public conversation about matters relating to boards, committees and such like, and there are a number of propositions contained within that. I think the Premier has made it clear that he is inviting the public to have a look at that—the opposition too for that matter. Have a look at it and consider what they have to say.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Griffiths</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000679">
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr Griffiths:</by>  The Premier described those being abolished as the sludge of government.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000680">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Indeed. I am not arguing with that at all. I am glad you were paying attention to it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000681">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  We hang on every word.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000682">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  As one should. We all do over here. The point is that this is one of the matters—</text>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000683">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3119">The Hon. T.R. Kenyon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000684">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Newland is warned for interjecting out of his seat and for interjecting that the deputy leader has never seen state cabinet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201409245ab1739aa84e4e4fb0000685">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  It is disappointing, but the clock appears to have stopped.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>