<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-08-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1393" />
  <endPage num="1513" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000209">
      <heading>Bills</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Statutes Amendment (SACAT) Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="r3632">
          <name>Statutes Amendment (SACAT) Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000210">
        <heading>Statutes Amendment (SACAT) Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000211">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000212">Debate resumed.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="4840" kind="speech">
          <name>Mr TARZIA</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
          <startTime time="2014-08-06T12:56:40" />
          <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000213">
            <timeStamp time="2014-08-06T12:56:40" />
            <by role="member" id="4840">Mr TARZIA (Hartley) (12:56):</by>  I would like to thank the hardworking public servants who have composed this bill, and I appreciate that their task has certainly not been easy. I also thank the government for the opportunity to be briefed on the matter. With super tribunals themselves, since at least the 1970s, there has certainly been a yearning for reform of specialised tribunals or decision-making bodies outside of the court system. One only has to look at the Kerr Committee in the 1970s and the Bland committee, which I think it is fair to say resulted in CATs all over the country—many CATs. The SACAT is the last one by the looks of it, after the NCAT, the QCAT and, my personal favourite, the VCAT.</text>
          <page num="1412" />
          <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000214">Once again, South Australia seems to be one of the last states in this nation to implement important reforms, but at least now we finally have a generic civil and administrative tribunal, hopefully. Super tribunals of this nature have existed for a while. In these jurisdictions, the tribunals replace an array of tribunals, which has made it simpler and easier for the people of those jurisdictions to access justice. When compared with the array of tribunals which the super tribunals replace, across the board there has been far greater accessibility, efficiency, consistency in decision-making, and greater independence from government in both perception and reality. I believe that SACAT will also allow for a much more transparent and consistent approach over the broad range of areas that SACAT will be able to preside over.</text>
          <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000215">Earlier this year we heard that the government appointed current Supreme Court judge Parker, Deputy President and current District Court judge Susanne Cole, and the registrar Clare Byrt. We expect SACAT to be up and running over the next few months and incorporate smaller tribunals in perhaps a staggered way. I note that the Law Society have complimented the bill. They have said that they welcome the important government initiative and generally endorse the establishment, the objectives, the structures, and the powers and procedures provided for in the bill. I seek leave to continue my remarks.</text>
          <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000216">Leave granted; debate adjourned.</text>
          <text id="20140806ea8d2648f7724cd290000217">
            <term>Sitting suspended from 12:59 to 14:00.</term>
          </text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>