<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-07-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1203" />
  <endPage num="1310" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
      <page num="1236" />
      <text id="201407245d7a7ecd3e8744e080000402">
        <heading>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-24">
            <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-24T14:47:11" />
        <text id="201407245d7a7ecd3e8744e080000403">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-24T14:47:11" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:47):</by>  To the Premier: was the Emergency Management Committee meeting called to resolve the conflict between the Minister for Health and the Minister for the Environment as to who was to take the lead on this contamination issue?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-24">
            <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-24T14:47:27" />
        <text id="201407245d7a7ecd3e8744e080000404">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-24T14:47:27" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:47):</by>  There was no conflict about the way in which this matter was to be dealt with. Remember, at this point in the process what we were dealing with were the number of potential phases. The first phase was to be dealt with by the Minister for Environment. That was a settled matter at that time. At some future point, a point we have not yet arrived at, it is likely that there will need to be a further phase, because it was contemplated that there may well be effects that essentially go beyond the remit of the Minister for Environment.</text>
        <text id="201407245d7a7ecd3e8744e080000405">Out of an abundance of preparation for that matter, there have been discussions about who should be the lead minister after the initial phase, which is not even yet complete, where the Minister for Environment was handling this matter. So there is no conflict, there is just the orderly discussion about what the government's arrangements would be for a matter of this sort, which obviously traverses a range of portfolio areas, including environment, health, and potentially into other areas that involve land use, not necessarily government land, but obviously Minister for Social Housing and potentially private sector land use. All of those particular portfolios were involved and so a discussion about what should happen beyond that point was had.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>