<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-07-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1125" />
  <endPage num="1202" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
      <page num="1162" />
      <text id="2014070319e24302ae434296a0000560">
        <heading>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-03">
            <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-03T14:43:01" />
        <text id="2014070319e24302ae434296a0000561">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-03T14:43:01" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:43):</by>  Supplementary, sir. Given that the government has known about the contamination in this area for six years, why is it only now that the government is appointing a contamination consultant to undertake further investigative work in suburbs adjacent to Clovelly Park?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2014070319e24302ae434296a0000562">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Well, again, that's not a supplementary because it doesn't arise out of the previous question or the previous answer; it's just a separate question. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Automotive Transformation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-07-03T14:43:25" />
        <text id="2014070319e24302ae434296a0000563">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-03T14:43:25" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for the Public Sector) (14:43):</by>  So, the question is about the fact that the government has now hired, or will hire, a consultant. I am happy to be corrected if I have misunderstood this but it seems to me that what has occurred is that there has now been a trigger reached in some houses which is an international trigger for further investigation and that's what has been acted upon.</text>
        <text id="2014070319e24302ae434296a0000564">The trigger has caused the various experts within the government to get together to work out what the implications are for those immediate houses. What that trigger has also done, as I understand it, is lead to the EPA deciding that they need to test the areas adjacent to ensure where that watercourse is moving and whether that has interacted with the soil.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>