<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-07-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1125" />
  <endPage num="1202" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
      <text id="20140703b0203b2f3eaf4c04a0000553">
        <heading>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-03">
            <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-03T14:41:02" />
        <text id="20140703b0203b2f3eaf4c04a0000554">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-03T14:41:02" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:41):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can the government explain the information dated July 2014 that has been recently put on the EPA website which indicates that contamination testing is required in areas adjacent to Clovelly Park?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Automotive Transformation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-03">
            <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-03T14:41:21" />
        <text id="20140703b0203b2f3eaf4c04a0000555">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-03T14:41:21" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for the Public Sector) (14:41):</by>  As I understand it, the contamination arises from contamination from industrial land use into the water underneath, the underground water. What is occurring is that in some places that chemical interaction and the proximity to certain soil types has meant that the material is moving up through the soil, in some places, and therefore, in parts, into people's houses. The way in which that underground watercourse is moving and the way in which it may or may not interact in other places is something that has been studied for some period of time and continues to be of concern to the EPA.</text>
        <text id="20140703b0203b2f3eaf4c04a0000556">I believe it was in the statement that they are going to continue to monitor on the outer edges to see if there has been any movement and I imagine that they will continue to be doing this for a long time to come. As we know, site contamination is a legacy that we bear of past industrial practices. We can't wish it away and we can't ignore it. What we need to do is make sure that we consistently monitor, track, and then act in a sensible way, a rational way, to the risks as identified jointly by the EPA and the public health area.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>