<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-07-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1017" />
  <endPage num="1124" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Commissioner for Public Sector Employment</name>
      <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000351">
        <heading>Commissioner for Public Sector Employment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-02">
            <name>Commissioner for Public Sector Employment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-02T14:18:35" />
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000352">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-02T14:18:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:18):</by>  This is a supplementary, because clearly the part that was offending in my question was related to the cabinet meeting, so I will ask a supplementary following on from the minister's answer. Did the minister, prior to 7 April, discuss with the Premier the proposed appointment of Ms Ranieri as Commissioner for Public Sector Employment?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-02">
            <name>Commissioner for Public Sector Employment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-02T14:19:00" />
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000353">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-02T14:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:19):</by>  I am very happy to answer this question. Can I say that I don't quite understand which part of a vacant office with two people being involved in running those arrangements—Ms Ranieri and the Commissioner for Public Employment, Mr McCann. One of them ceases to actually be in that role, you amalgamate those two agencies. If you can't understand that Ms Ranieri wasn't a frontrunner for that position then I can't help you. The fact that she is an eminently suitable candidate for this position, the fact that she is a first-class public servant that you are seeking to cast doubt about her suitability or otherwise for that role, or indeed the process associated with it—</text>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000354">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000355">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I call the leader to order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000356">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —is just fairly standard form for those opposite. It is a pretty simple matter: we said before the election that we would pull together these three agencies. We actually have Ms Ranieri running these three agencies; there is a vacancy. She continues in her role.</text>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000357">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1044" />
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000358">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Obviously, she was going to be a frontrunner for the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment. Obviously, the minister undertook a process to make sure that she was the suitable candidate for that role. She got that advice, then the Governor was provided with the relevant recommendation, and the appointment has been made. It is completely appropriate, the steps that have been taken—</text>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000359">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000360">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —and I strongly support her appointment.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000361">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Supplementary, sir?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140702d475dfd61c7d4d4690000362">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before the supplementary, would the leader be seated. The member for Morialta is warned for the first time; his benefit of clergy is over. The member for Chaffey is warned for the first time, and I call to order the members for Heysen, Schubert and Mount Gambier. Leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>