<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="867" />
  <endPage num="929" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20140619b04697253ee843a4b0000382">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-19">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-19T14:24:38" />
        <text id="20140619b04697253ee843a4b0000383">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-19T14:24:38" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  A supplementary, if I may. During the two months that Renewal SA was discussing the purchase of land at Gillman with ACP—that is, before ACP provided a detailed proposal—did Renewal SA provide ACP with any information that was not available publicly?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-19">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-19T14:25:08" />
        <text id="20140619b04697253ee843a4b0000384">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-19T14:25:08" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:25):</by>  These questions, which are very, very open-ended and capture potentially everybody, are impossible for me to answer. I am not able to say exactly who in Renewal might have said what to whom—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140619b04697253ee843a4b0000385">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  That's why you should ask.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140619b04697253ee843a4b0000386">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I warn the deputy leader for the first time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140619b04697253ee843a4b0000387">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —so I am not able to answer that question. But can I say this: I imagine, in the nature of some commercial conversations between elements of the government and ACP leading up to the preparation of the deed, there may have been, for the reason I have already explained, commercial-in-confidence IP-type material which would have been provided to the government by ACP. I don't believe there is anything that would have been provided in the other direction which would not have been available to anyone else.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>