<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="867" />
  <endPage num="929" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20140619fa7b0bf457ec47f0b0000321">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-19">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-19T14:07:23" />
        <text id="20140619fa7b0bf457ec47f0b0000322">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-19T14:07:23" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:07):</by>  I have a supplementary for the Premier. As the person who signed the Gillman option deed, as described by the Deputy Premier, will the Premier confirm who is correct regarding this as being a requirement of a resources hub: the Treasurer or the Deputy Premier? The Deputy Premier is saying it is an option; the Treasurer is saying it is a requirement. You signed the deed; what is the answer?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140619fa7b0bf457ec47f0b0000323">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Well, I didn't actually sign any deed and I call the deputy leader to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-06-19T14:07:59" />
        <text id="20140619fa7b0bf457ec47f0b0000324">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-19T14:07:59" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:07):</by>  I've had the document that presently exists described to me—and I think this is probably the correct legal description—as an 'option deed', which says that if a certain number of things happen at certain times, then further steps will unfold. I have said also in the parliament on a couple of occasions—and the deputy leader would be very aware of this—that there is presently litigation proceeding in the Supreme Court.</text>
        <text id="20140619fa7b0bf457ec47f0b0000325">It would seem to me that the appropriate way for the parties to that litigation to go about obtaining material relevant to their proceedings in the Supreme Court is to use what we used in the old days to call 'discovery' or 'interrogatories'—I know they have new names now, but I am a bit of a traditionalist and that's what we used to call them—and that this is not the forum for that sort of inquisition to occur.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>