<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="775" />
  <endPage num="865" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="201406183d2f91c765164ecb80001020">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-18">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-18T14:38:03" />
        <text id="201406183d2f91c765164ecb80001021">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-18T14:38:03" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:38):</by>  A further question, this time to the Minister for Planning. Will the minister confirm that the option entered into with Adelaide Capital Partners and regarding land at Gillman does not have any legal requirement for land at that site to be allocated for mining and resources businesses?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-18">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-18T14:38:25" />
        <page num="827" />
        <text id="201406183d2f91c765164ecb80001022">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-18T14:38:25" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:38):</by>  There's a couple of issues there. The first one is that there's a difference between the zoning of a piece of land and the actual activity that might be performed, given whatever the zoning might be, and there is no zoning requirement as such with regard to that.</text>
        <text id="201406183d2f91c765164ecb80001023">The other point I would make is that, as I have already said, the government has made no secret of the fact that we would be very keen to see oil and gas-type hub activities occur on that site. And I think the Treasurer, wearing his other hat, has said that many times, and I think the Premier has said that many times. Whether or not that is able to be achieved will depend on a number of factors which are out of the government's control and, I suspect, out of the control of ACP.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>