<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="775" />
  <endPage num="865" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000978">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-18">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-18T14:27:16" />
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000979">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-18T14:27:16" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:27):</by>  In the event then that this detailed project plan hasn't yet been received, could the deputy leader confirm whether the plan is to include in it a requirement to include a mining and resources hub to be built as part of its plan?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-18">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-18T14:27:41" />
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000980">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-18T14:27:41" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:27):</by>  I am not going to go into what may or may not be in a plan, but something else is coming back to me, and it was something else that was in that statement on the 14<sup>th</sup> of this month, which happened immediately after the 13<sup>th</sup> of this month, which was exactly six months to the minute after the statement was made by the now Treasurer, which was some 35 years after he was born, and so on.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. A. Koutsantonis</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000981">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis:</by>  It's 42.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000982">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  It's 42, sorry. The situation is that it has never been hidden in any of the statements made by either the Premier or the former treasurer that of course the government would love to see development in South Australia which worked as a complement to oil and gas industries operating particularly in the north of this state. There has never been any question about that. It is also equally clear that anybody who might have a piece of land somewhere and have the aspiration of having it used for oil and gas purposes is only going to be able to achieve that aspiration if there are people in the oil and gas industry with whom they can do deals and who want to be participants in that.</text>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000983">The government is in this context two places removed from any such conversation, so I think the premise on which the honourable member's question is based—that is, is there some sort of requirement or condition precedent about having something to do with oil and gas—is misconceived. Whatever our aspirations, and we have been very public about those, we do not—</text>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000984">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1813">Ms Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000985">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  No, no, no, I'm sorry, we have. The member for Heysen is shaking her head.</text>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000986">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000987">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  No, just shaking her head. So I just say that I think the Treasurer, who still remains the Minister for Mining, and the Premier have said on several occasions we would be delighted for South Australia if we could become a place that could offer some sort of hub or investment opportunity for the oil and gas industry, of course, but we don't control that industry, and that would be a matter for private players to negotiate out.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140618c9a0188da7c74abc80000988">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before the deputy leader starts, I call the members for Heysen and Mount Gambier to order.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>