<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="713" />
  <endPage num="773" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>O-Bahn Tunnel</name>
      <page num="739" />
      <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000402">
        <heading>O-Bahn Tunnel</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-17">
            <name>O-Bahn Tunnel</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-17T14:48:54" />
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000403">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-17T14:48:54" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:48):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. Was a cost-benefit analysis undertaken for the O-Bahn tunnel project prior to its announcement and, if so, what was the cost-benefit ratio?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-17">
            <name>O-Bahn Tunnel</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-17T14:49:10" />
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000404">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-17T14:49:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:49):</by>  Thank you very much, deputy leader. I am very pleased to be answering another question on this fantastic project. I note with some interest that the deputy leader is asking me this question rather than the shadow spokesperson for transport but, nonetheless, we will continue. This is a far superior project to—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000405">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000406">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Could the minister be seated? I've got a strong suspicion that this is not going to be a point of order, but I will hear it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000407">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  How could you possibly say that, Mr Speaker? I seek your guidance, sir, to this extent: the minister seems to be denying that he has responsibility for transport and infrastructure. This is an infrastructure project, so if the minister feels he is unable to answer it and that someone else in the government wants to take it, I am happy for them to do that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000408">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  That is a bogus point of order, and the deputy leader is warned for the first time. Minister for Transport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000409">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  As I said in my previous answer, we were very pleased, the Treasurer and I, to be announcing this project. This is a project that will deliver very substantial benefits to people who use the O-Bahn corridor, in particular in comparison to a project which was previously announced—from memory, in 2009 or 2010—and which provided for dedicated busways rather than a tunnel, which is now being proposed in the O-Bahn city access.</text>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000410">This will avoid two intersections, the Hackney Road and North Terrace intersection and also the Dequetteville Terrace and Rundle Road intersection, which is a far superior outcome to what would have been delivered under the previous, much cheaper O-Bahn project. We are confident that this is a good project. It does stack up. It is good value for money and will provide appropriate benefits for people who use the O-Bahn public transport thoroughfare.</text>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000411">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4342">Mr van Holst Pellekaan interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140617a60116bf2a12464cb0000412">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Stuart is called to order. Deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>