<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="641" />
  <endPage num="712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Freedom of Information</name>
      <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000699">
        <heading>Freedom of Information</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Freedom of Information</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:53:38" />
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000700">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:53:38" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:53):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Will the Attorney-General at least meet with the Ombudsman to discuss the claims of multiple witnesses whom he has reported on in this report yesterday to ascertain the detail of their claims? At least then the Attorney can ask each of his ministers of the nine agencies that have reported in the Ombudsman's audit.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Freedom of Information</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:54:06" />
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000701">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:54:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:54):</by>  I am not, in my capacity as Attorney-General, in a position to go around conducting what amounts to an investigation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000702">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  You are charged with the Freedom of Information Act.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000703">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader will withdraw from the chamber for the next half hour.</text>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000704">
          <term>The honourable member for Bragg having withdrawn from the chamber:</term>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000705">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  As I was saying, as Attorney-General I am not in a position to conduct an investigation. I do not have the power as Attorney-General to compel witnesses. I do not as Attorney-General have the power to compel evidence. I do not as Attorney-General have power to compel the production of documents. In fact, I don't have the power to do anything of that nature. But—</text>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000706">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000707">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley will withdraw from the chamber for the next half hour.</text>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000708">
          <event>The honourable member for Unley having withdrawn from the chamber:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140605005ded6737024ba0b0000709">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  But, Mr Speaker, I do know somebody who has all of those powers; in fact, I know somebody who has all the powers of a royal commissioner, and his name is the Ombudsman. And, guess what? The Ombudsman is already in possession of all of this material. So, as far as I am concerned, the Ombudsman is perfectly able to take this matter forward, and let the cards fall where they will. There is another agency that could take this matter forward if somebody wished to draw it to their attention and if they thought it warranted any further investigation. Let the cards go where they may. I am not in a position to conduct an investigation.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>