<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="641" />
  <endPage num="712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Freedom of Information</name>
      <text id="2014060540459df5eb5b469190000695">
        <heading>Freedom of Information</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Freedom of Information</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:51:54" />
        <text id="2014060540459df5eb5b469190000696">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:51:54" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:51):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Given the Attorney-General's statement yesterday and again today in relation to FOI officers—yesterday's statement was, 'We defend their right to be an independent officer and we condemn anybody who would attempt to interfere with that'—and his indication today that they could take action themselves if they want, why won't the minister at least investigate the claims made in the Ombudsman's report that ministerial officers have attempted to interfere with them?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Freedom of Information</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:52:28" />
        <text id="2014060540459df5eb5b469190000697">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:52:28" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:52):</by>  As I said, I have had a chance to have a look at the report, although I haven't read every single word. I have read this bit. I looked at the footnote attached to this bit, and it said, 'See transcript'—which is not available. I do not know who this person is, and more particularly, if you read the footnote and you read the passage that everyone is getting very excited about, there is not one scintilla of evidence to suggest the person involved was in any way affected by the alleged conversation with the unknown person about an unknown topic.</text>
        <page num="684" />
        <text id="2014060540459df5eb5b469190000698">I come back to the point. If there are FOI officers who are being asked to do things they know they shouldn't be asked to do by people who shouldn't be asking them to do that, they should complain and if they do so they will have the support of the government because they are doing the right thing.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>