<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="641" />
  <endPage num="712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover</name>
      <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000607">
        <heading>WorkCover</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>WorkCover</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:30:10" />
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000608">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:30:10" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:30):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Is the Treasurer aware that the predicted savings under the government's proposed WorkCover reforms were based on actuarial advice undertaken in just 10 days by Finity Consulting?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>WorkCover</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:30:30" />
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000609">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:30:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:30):</by>  As Minister for Industrial Relations, this is a matter that is appropriate for me to answer. The investigations that have been going on in relation to WorkCover matters have been going on for the greater part of the whole of last calendar year. In fact, if I recall correctly, the Premier asked me to take over the management of that matter in January or February of last year.</text>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000610">Members would be aware that there was a bill brought to this place in the middle part of last year in relation to the governing body of WorkCover, which was a part of that work. There was also a discussion with various parties about amendments to the WorkCover legislation, which ultimately did not result in any movement at that time. There was also—</text>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000611">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1813">Ms Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000612">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Heysen is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000613">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —a new charter, which the Premier (as then treasurer) and I signed into effect, and I think that came into effect, from memory, in about September of last year. There have been ongoing discussions with various people, including actuaries, over the course of most of last year, in particular towards the end of last year and, I have to say, those conversations have continued since. So, there is no secret that we have been talking to actuaries in relation to WorkCover—no secret whatsoever—and so we should.</text>
        <page num="679" />
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000614">Can I make the point that the reason we spoke to actuaries about WorkCover is that we wanted to be in a position to be able to tell this parliament that we had actuarial evidence to support propositions we wish to advance about law reform. What a contrast with the resolutions that have been moved here in relation to other matters touching on WorkCover where no attention whatsoever has been paid by the opposition to the actuaries' reports, one of which was dated 30 September and provided to those opposite, indicating a cost of something in the order of $90-odd million across the forward estimates to the WorkCover scheme.</text>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000615">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000616">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Absolutely. We have spoken to actuaries and we will continue to do so.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406058e433be2e455453590000617">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>