<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="641" />
  <endPage num="712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Federal Budget</name>
      <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000559">
        <heading>Federal Budget</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Federal Budget</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:19:43" />
        <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000560">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:19:43" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (14:19):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Can the minister provide further advice on federal funding to education?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Federal Budget</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T14:20:03" />
        <page num="676" />
        <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000561">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T14:20:03" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development) (14:20):</by>  Day by day, we are clawing more and more information about the Abbott government's budget and its implication for schools in South Australia and, quite frankly, the situation gets worse day by day. Late last night in the Senate estimates, commonwealth officials finally confirmed that the federal budget papers assume that the commonwealth funding will be indexed at CPI at only 2.5 per cent—almost half the agreed 4.7 per cent—and they have also gutted the additional funding to bring South Australia's schools towards the school resourcing standard.</text>
        <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000562">It seems to me that minister Pyne hasn't been able to make up his mind on indexation. For the HECS-HELP loans, he wants students to pay real interest rates up to 6 per cent—well above CPI—but when it comes to his education funding, funding for our schools, CPI is good enough for him.</text>
        <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000563">With CPI at 2.5 per cent, this means $335 million will be ripped out of years five and six of the Gonski agreement—$15 million more than we were led to believe only three weeks ago. That's the equivalent of 170 student support officers we won't have, or 130 additional teachers we won't have to teach our children. Over the decade, $1.7 billion of South Australian school funding has gone. That $1.7 billion is 70 per cent of what we are spending on public schools this year. It is $200 million less than we knew three weeks ago—that's the equivalent of 1,800 teachers we won't have. The cuts to years five and six equate to an average of $1,280 per student.</text>
        <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000564">Let me give you some perspective on this. On current enrolments, that's indicative of Port Lincoln High School, in the member for Flinders' electorate, losing around $900,000 of funding supports and resources in two years; for Mount Gambier High School, a loss of $1.2 million in a two-year period. Kadina Memorial School, in the member for Goyder's electorate, would lose around $1.3 million of funding resources or support.</text>
        <text id="2014060561253a3113f742a0b0000565">These cuts to education by Christopher Pyne will hurt, particularly in regional and remote areas. Members should take note. It was good, however, to see the member for Morphett join the government in his public criticism of the Abbott/Hockey budget. At least he had the courage to speak up. The real question is: will the rest of the Liberal members in this place stand up for their schools?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>