<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="553" />
  <endPage num="640" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Motions</name>
    <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000674">
      <heading>Motions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Industrial Relations Commission</name>
      <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000675">
        <heading>Industrial Relations Commission</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T16:36:44" />
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000676">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T16:36:44" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (16:36):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000677">
          <inserted>That pursuant to section 30 of the Fair Work Act 1994, the nominee of this house to the panel to consult with the Minister for Industrial Relations regarding the appointment to the position of Deputy Commissioner to the Industrial Relations Commission of South Australia be the member for Little Para.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T16:37:19" />
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000678">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T16:37:19" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (16:37):</by>  I would like to move an amendment to the motion. Do I need to have that in writing?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000679">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  It would be handy.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000680">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Do you want me to vamp for a moment while that is being brought down?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000681">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, do that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000682">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Well, I think that the tradition in this place is that matters such as this are in fact dealt with in consultation with a member of the government and a member of the opposition. It is my understanding that a member of the government has been appointed in the other place to be their representative in this matter, and I therefore would move that the member for Davenport, rather than the member for Little Para, be placed in this motion. I believe that we now have that in writing, and, therefore, I move:</text>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000683">
          <inserted>That the words 'Little Para' be deleted and replaced with the word 'Davenport'.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T16:38:23" />
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000684">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T16:38:23" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (16:38):</by>  The reason that the opposition has moved this amendment is that the government is about to go through a process of setting up a panel for appointment for the Deputy Commissioner position to the Industrial Relations Commission and, under the act, the lower house appoints one person, and the Legislative Council appoints another. It is a surprise to the opposition that the government is proposing to appoint a Labor member from the lower house and a Labor member from the upper house, which is against all traditions of this particular provision.</text>
        <page num="601" />
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000685">I have previously been a shadow minister for industrial relations when the former member for Lee, Michael Wright, was the minister and he made sure that there was one person from the other major party as part of the consultation process. What we have here is the minister suggesting that the Labor Minister for Industrial Relations is going to be consulting with a Labor backbencher from the lower house and a Labor backbencher from the upper house, and the opposition gets no say whatsoever to an appointment to the Industrial Relations Commission. That has never been the practice.</text>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000686">We say that the appropriate thing is that the member for Davenport happens to be the Shadow Minister for Industrial Relations and is the appropriate representative of this house, and the government can move their representative from another place. So this simple amendment reinstates what has been the practice in relation to these provisions for my 20 years in this place and that is that there be one person representative of each of the major parties in these sorts of appointments.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000687">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I do not wish to make any more of an issue of this matter than needs be the case. I have to say that this matter is something to which I have not spent a great deal of time attending. Indeed, I thought I was of the understanding this was a routine matter coming before the house. If it turns out that unexpectedly the upper house—which has a limited number of Labor members—has nominated one of those limited number to be on the committee and it is indeed not the practice that there is one from each house from the same side of parliament, I would just like the opportunity to have a look at that. So I am happy for this to be adjourned while I have a talk with the member for Davenport and we will try and work it out.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000688">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  You seek leave to continue your remarks?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000689">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I do indeed, yes.</text>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000690">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000691">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The adjourned debate be made an order for the day—on motion perhaps.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000692">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  On motion, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000693">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  And with the question of vamping, is that in the urban dictionary?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000694">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Sir, I suggest that you google it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000695">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Thank you.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Ms REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000696">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Ms REDMOND:</by>  Sir, I understand it is the equivalent of 'scat' in jazz.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000697">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Thank you to the member for Heysen for her assistance.</text>
        <text id="20140604b13853e211974d45a0000698">Debate adjourned.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>