<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="553" />
  <endPage num="640" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000562">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-04">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T15:04:30" />
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000563">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T15:04:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:04):</by>  May I have a further supplementary?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000564">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Further supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000565">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  When Mr Fred Hansen gave his evidence and stated that, in July and August 2013, 'a series of discussions occurred that were really outlining what would need to be in a proposal to even be able to be considered by government', was the state government following its own unsolicited proposals policy?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T15:05:01" />
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000566">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T15:05:01" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:05):</by>  I will take that question on notice and bring back an answer to the house but, just so you are aware of what the process was, we had the head of the EDB who was warranting the importance of this project as a significant project concerning the future economic development of this state. He brought that proposition to me with the proponent and then the matter was sent off to the relevant agency and the relevant minister who, I understood, undertook the investigations consistent with all of the relevant protocols.</text>
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000567">That is my present advice and I have no reason to doubt it.  Then it was presented to cabinet and the cabinet decision was made to give this company the option so that they could go away and spend very considerable amounts of money before they could put themselves in a position to actually commit to this arrangement. That is all that's happened, and I am sure you will spend the next few months pursuing, essentially, this false alley.</text>
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000568">Just like the member for Unley led you up a false path in relation to the Church of Scientology, and just like the member for Unley led you up a false path in relation to your attacks on me in relation to the Debelle inquiry, you will waste more time and effort and you will continue to bog yourself down without addressing the real issues that confront this state, which are about creating jobs. Why do you think we would be actually pursuing this with as much vigour as we are if it was not directed solely and entirely about developing this state so that we can create jobs so that our kids can have a future?</text>
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000569">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201406040c7d6c2be668474ea0000570">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before the next question, I remind the Treasurer that he is on two warnings. Deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>