<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="431" />
  <endPage num="551" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>ForestrySA</name>
      <page num="470" />
      <text id="20140603e6f3d868994f447fa0000502">
        <heading>ForestrySA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-03">
            <name>ForestrySA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-03T15:12:28" />
        <text id="20140603e6f3d868994f447fa0000503">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-03T15:12:28" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop) (15:12):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Why did the Premier tell the house on 20 May that he stood by his previous commitment in relation to the sale of the timber harvests and said, 'There are serious conditions we are putting on the sale to make sure that there is long term certainty for the people that work directly for ForestrySA', given that it is now confirmed that 60 ForestrySA jobs will be lost?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-03">
            <name>ForestrySA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-03T15:12:55" />
        <text id="20140603e6f3d868994f447fa0000504">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-03T15:12:55" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:12):</by>  We do stand by that commitment. I notice that it was expressed in a slightly different form when it was asked of me the first time in parliament. Now the actual words are put in the public sphere of course we stand by that commitment. As the minister has just suggested, the long-term strength of this sector of ForestrySA and, indeed, the forest industry generally relies upon the sorts of decisions that have been taken.</text>
        <text id="20140603e6f3d868994f447fa0000505">I think what has been lost in all of this is that these are voluntary separation packages. Despite the broader commitments that have been made to the public sector, we have made it clear that these particular workers in ForestrySA will have ongoing employment. They can make their own decisions about whether they choose to remain in the public sector, and suitable redeployment arrangements will be made for them. It is a particular commitment that we have made to those particular workers given the circumstances of the sale and the expectations that were generated.</text>
        <text id="20140603e6f3d868994f447fa0000506">If that's the best you can do in terms of trawling up something that I said—which is materially different, I must say, from what was told to the parliament last time we met—then you are going to have to look a little bit further. I maintain my commitment that the long-term security for those workers and for the forestry industry more generally is going to be advanced by the arrangements we put in place.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>