<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="431" />
  <endPage num="551" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>ForestrySA</name>
      <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000487">
        <heading>ForestrySA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4844" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mount Gambier</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-03">
            <name>ForestrySA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-03T15:09:22" />
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000488">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-03T15:09:22" />
          <by role="member" id="4844">Mr BELL (Mount Gambier) (15:09):</by>  My question is also to the Minister for Regional Development. Does the minister support the decision to make redundant 60 ForestrySA employees?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3117" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mawson</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation and Sport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Racing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-03">
            <name>ForestrySA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-03T15:09:39" />
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000489">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-03T15:09:39" />
          <by role="member" id="3117">The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL (Mawson—Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Recreation and Sport, Minister for Racing) (15:09):</by>  As the minister responsible for forests I will take that question . The member for Mount Gambier knows—I was on the phone to him—he was one of the first people I rang to advise of the decision last week. He also knows that we have to make ForestrySA more commercially viable, as we have 3½ years to go until the contract with OneFortyOne is to be renewed and we need to do everything we possibly can. The good news for the South-East—</text>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000490">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000491">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is warned for the first time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3117" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000492">
          <by role="member" id="3117">The Hon. L.W.K. BIGNELL:</by>  The good news for the South-East is that the forestry industry is very strong at the moment and that is very good for the people who are likely to put up their hand if they want to continue working in the industry. When I was down there a couple of months ago talking to haulage operators and harvester operators, they were crying out for more workers. It is good that the industry is going so well there.</text>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000493">I am optimistic about the future of the South-East. I know the member for Mount Gambier is, and we will do everything we can to work together, along with the rest of the community down there, to build jobs. There are 60 voluntary targeted separation packages that have been offered and from what I understand there are a lot of people who are working with ForestrySA who welcome those packages with open arms.</text>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000494">We are going to work on the wider industry down there to make sure that the forestry industry booms. We know the forecast for the next two years at least is very positive, as well, so we think we have a bright future there. In other portfolio areas I have responsibility for—tourism, agriculture, food and fisheries—we are also very optimistic that we can keep jobs growing down there. We are committed to all the regions of South Australia.</text>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000495">I know there had been some talk in recent years when the contract with OneFortyOne was being negotiated of pessimism about the South-East, but having been down there recently (and promising to be down there again in about five weeks), I know there are a lot of people who are quite optimistic about what is happening in the South-East.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000496">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000497">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order, member for Stuart.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000498">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Mr Speaker, you have given the minister two minutes and I believe standing order 98 requires him to address the substance of the question. The question was very simple: does the Minister for Regional Development agree with the decision? I would like him to answer that question, please.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000499">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The point of order is frivolous, because it is the customary practice that any minister can answer the question and that is just what the Minister for Agriculture has done.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000500">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Sir, the point of order 98 is still applicable. It was clearly debate that was being called by the member for Stuart.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140603a7de8ad12d6548f290000501">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I don't uphold the point of order. Member for Mackillop.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>