<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="351" />
  <endPage num="429" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ministerial Staff</name>
      <text id="2014052223ffa80ffd6e417ea0000600">
        <heading>Ministerial Staff</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-22">
            <name>Ministerial Staff</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-22T14:46:50" />
        <text id="2014052223ffa80ffd6e417ea0000601">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-22T14:46:50" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (14:46):</by>  My supplementary question is also to the Premier. What is the nature of what the Premier terms 'mitigating factors' that have led to this offence only being dealt with by what is described as a 'first and final warning'?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-22">
            <name>Ministerial Staff</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-22T14:47:07" />
        <text id="2014052223ffa80ffd6e417ea0000602">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-22T14:47:07" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:47):</by>  I'm not going to go into the nature—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2014052223ffa80ffd6e417ea0000603">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2014052223ffa80ffd6e417ea0000604">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Well, I refuse to. These are staffing matters which are not traditionally exposed in this fashion. What is appropriate is to know the standards of conduct that I have applied to this matter, the principles that have governed this matter, the fact that the particular disciplinary action has been carried out in accordance with those matters.</text>
        <text id="2014052223ffa80ffd6e417ea0000605">I'm not going to traverse on the privacy of the individuals involved, except to say that we have insisted on a certain standard of behaviour. This has fallen well short of that standard of behaviour, and the relevant disciplinary action has been taken, but a judgement has been made and I believe, in the circumstances, the correct judgement, that termination of employment was not appropriate in this case but that a final warning was issued in relation to this conduct. Having regard to all of the circumstances, I believe that is the appropriate judgement.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>