<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="117" />
  <endPage num="195" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201405086a8fb2eab57645dc90000722">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-08">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-08T14:40:20" />
        <text id="201405086a8fb2eab57645dc90000723">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-08T14:40:20" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:40):</by>  Further supplementary: given that this child was able to access, apparently, the Safe Babies Program and have access to respite and independent agencies, are you satisfied, notwithstanding that multiple notifications had been made about this young girl prior to August 2011, that there was no need to make any changes to your department to deal with cases which clearly have identified that there was a problem? Given all those circumstances, is it your view that there is no need to make any changes to the way your department operates as a result of the disclosure of the death of this child?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-08">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-08T14:41:09" />
        <text id="201405086a8fb2eab57645dc90000724">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-08T14:41:09" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development) (14:41):</by>  I will take advice from the Child Death and Serious Injury Review Committee, which is independent. It is made up of very eminent people who will interrogate this case very, very carefully. They will provide recommendations to me, as they do on a regular basis, as they review cases where children may be harmed through a variety of ways, including, for example, swimming pool deaths, which has been an area that they have made recommendations that we have acted upon, and road safety issues in relation to the way children are harnessed in cars. I am sure that this will have their very close attention, and they are the people that will give me the recommendations.</text>
        <text id="201405086a8fb2eab57645dc90000725">I am not a professional social worker; I do not have the qualifications to make clear assessments about social work processes, but we have an independent body that was not in place prior to 2002 that will do that. In the main, the recommendations of the Child Death and Serious Injury Review Committee have, as I understand it, been acted upon.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>