<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="39" />
  <endPage num="116" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Debelle Inquiry</name>
      <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000486">
        <heading>Debelle Inquiry</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-07">
            <name>Debelle Inquiry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-07T14:56:22" />
        <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000487">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-07T14:56:22" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:56):</by>  Could the Attorney-General then advise as to the further events that are to occur or not occur to disqualify the release of the report and transcript and documents and the like, given that this morning charges against the offender have been dropped and the suppression order lifted? I am sure the Attorney will be well aware of that. What are the other impeding features that prevent him from determining that the legal event has occurred?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000488">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  That's the unknown unknowns</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-05-07T14:57:00" />
        <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000489">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-07T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:57):</by>  Yes. Look, I was trying to be slightly—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="74" />
        <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000490">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Funny.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000491">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  No, careful about how I described this. Again, because I am not wishing to cross the boundary that was originally set by Mr Debelle, I am being careful in what I am saying. I have been advised by the DPP—and I am being careful about what I am saying here—that at present there is the possibility of further legal action relevant to this particular matter which may disturb the current state of affairs. For that reason, and for that reason alone, I am reluctant to go into any further exposition on the matter, but I can tell the honourable member that it will be clear fairly soon whether or not that other matter is a live matter.</text>
        <text id="201405071dcfbe2ab13a4aeca0000492">If it is clear that that other matter is not going to proceed, then that is fine and as far as I am concerned the release that the honourable member is asking about would be in order. If that other matter remains a live matter, then it may be some time until the release is in order. Another way of explaining this is that this is completely out of the hands of the Crown, this particular unknown that I am talking about. It is not a matter of the Crown having to make a choice here. It is a matter of somebody else having to make a choice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>