<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="39" />
  <endPage num="116" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Debelle Inquiry</name>
      <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000473">
        <heading>Debelle Inquiry</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-07">
            <name>Debelle Inquiry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-07T14:53:41" />
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000474">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-07T14:53:41" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:53):</by>  My question again is to the Attorney-General. Has the legal event identified by Justice Debelle in the education inquiry report as preventing the publication of the unedited version of the report now occurred?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-07">
            <name>Debelle Inquiry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-07T14:53:57" />
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000475">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-07T14:53:57" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:53):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question, and I would like to advise the parliament as best I can in relation to the matter. As things presently stand, I have sought advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions, so what I am about to say might seem a little unhelpful but, nevertheless, for those who can read between the lines, it says all it needs to say. I think I should start off by quoting the famous former secretary of state of the United States, Mr Donald Rumsfeld, that there are the things called the 'known knowns, the known unknowns—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3119" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. T.R. Kenyon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000476">
          <by role="member" id="3119">The Hon. T.R. Kenyon:</by>  Defence.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000477">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —defence, I beg your pardon. There are the 'known knowns, the known unknowns and the unknown unknowns.' The particular answer to this question incorporates all three of those and, because of that—if I can still explain it this way—there are known knowns. They are not so bad; that is all good. Then there are seriously some known unknowns which are yet to become known.</text>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000478">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000479">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I am not joking. I am being quite serious about this.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000480">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  You do have privilege, John.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000481">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Yes, I know, but I am trying to stick with the spirit of the recommendations of Mr Debelle's report. Mr Debelle was concerned that before a particular event had been resolved, there should not be the release of an unedited version of the report.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000482">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  Correct.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000483">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Okay. Perhaps another way of explaining it is that, in the space of known unknowns and unknown unknowns, there is still the capability of a matter yet to be resolved.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000484">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  So the answer is no.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140507d7eb6cfdd8534164b0000485">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  So, the answer is: for the time being, in view of those unknowns, it is not my intention to release the report but, having said that, as soon as I am clear from the Director of Public Prosecutions that those unknowns have become clear, one way or the other, the spirit of the recommendations of Mr Debelle will be embraced and that will in due course result in the release of the material unedited.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>