<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="39" />
  <endPage num="116" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="201405075f4687bd75dc4c1890000336">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-07">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-07T14:22:24" />
        <text id="201405075f4687bd75dc4c1890000337">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-07T14:22:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:22):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Was an independent valuation of the land at Gilman undertaken and was the advice provided to cabinet when making a decision regarding the Adelaide Capital Partners proposal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-07">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-07T14:22:41" />
        <text id="201405075f4687bd75dc4c1890000338">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-07T14:22:41" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:22):</by>  The advice that we based our decision on was whether this was good value for money in relation to the offer that we received for this piece of land. We were told that we were gaining a premium price. That was the very clear advice that we received from Renewal SA. The way in which they gathered their information is a matter for them. They presented that to us. We relied upon that advice we received in reaching that judgement.</text>
        <text id="201405075f4687bd75dc4c1890000339">Can I just add this particular caveat? This has not been an agreement that has been settled yet. This is an option for a company to go out to investigate whether it can gain the international investors necessary to be able to proceed with this process. They were not going to spend the money necessary to do that unless they had a period of exclusivity. That is all that has been given. We are preserving the capacity for them to be able to raise the funds to allow them to be able to make this extraordinary investment which will develop this important piece of land for the future of South Australia.</text>
        <text id="201405075f4687bd75dc4c1890000340">So, in all of your efforts about scrutinising this matter—and I have no difficulty with the scrutiny at all; in fact, I think you will be surprised at what you will find when you do participate in the select committee in the upper house—I ask you to take care in ensuring that you do not do this in a way that puts in jeopardy this important arrangement for the future of South Australia. Of course it is a massive threat to South Australia if you behave badly and destructively and cause us to lose this opportunity. The people of South Australia will visit at your feet the loss of the opportunity to develop a piece of land that has been lying idle for decades and decades. If that happens, we will place it firmly at your feet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201405075f4687bd75dc4c1890000341">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Supplementary from the leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>