<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="37" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Confidentiality Agreements</name>
      <text id="201405062927e888cda24a66a0000712">
        <heading>Public Sector Confidentiality Agreements</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-06">
            <name>Public Sector Confidentiality Agreements</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-06T16:50:35" />
        <text id="201405062927e888cda24a66a0000713">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-06T16:50:35" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (16:50):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. When government agencies require public servants who are leaving the service of the government to sign confidentiality agreements about matters that have been in dispute with their employer, is it acceptable to the government for the confidentiality agreement to require the public servant not to go to ICAC?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-06">
            <name>Public Sector Confidentiality Agreements</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-06T16:51:05" />
        <text id="201405062927e888cda24a66a0000714">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-06T16:51:05" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (16:51):</by>  Yes, I thank the honourable member for the question. Can I say first of all, I am not aware of any such documents. I don't have any role in providing advice personally in relation to separations between individual employees and the state government. All I can say is that if such a document were to exist, I would be very interested to see it, because I would wonder whether such a document would first of all be enforceable, given the state of the legislation, but secondly it would indicate to me that there was some unsatisfactory advice being given around the place and that that needed to be fixed up. I take the honourable member's question very seriously. I think if there were such a thing going on, I would invite the honourable member to provide me with the details so that I can make the appropriate investigations.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>