<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="37" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>APY Lands, Truancy Officers</name>
      <text id="201405069b4cefcfaa794fa4b0000657">
        <heading>APY lands, truancy officers</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-06">
            <name>APY lands, truancy officers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-06T16:40:57" />
        <text id="201405069b4cefcfaa794fa4b0000658">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-06T16:40:57" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (16:40):</by>  My question, again, is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Why was the state department for Education and Child Development so uncooperative with the federal government's placement of truancy officers on the APY lands (and they were; trust me)?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-06">
            <name>APY lands, truancy officers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-06T16:41:15" />
        <text id="201405069b4cefcfaa794fa4b0000659">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-06T16:41:15" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development) (16:41):</by>  I do not accept the premise of the question. In fact, we have cooperated with the federal government. What we did point out to the federal government—and we were insistent upon—was that people who were engaged on the APY lands to work with school-age children had to have a criminal history clearance. We were not prepared for anyone to go in there and be engaged. That was the problem. That was the delay. Apart from that I corresponded with the federal minister. We were supportive of them providing truancy officers. It is yet to be seen whether that has any impact whatsoever but, in fact, we were not prepared for the federal government to engage anyone who had not been properly screened to work with children.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>