<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="37" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000453">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Automotive Industry</name>
      <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000454">
        <heading>Automotive Industry</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-06">
            <name>Automotive Industry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-06T15:52:28" />
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000455">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-06T15:52:28" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (15:52):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Why did the Premier reject the federal plan for the automotive manufacturing sector prior to the election despite today committing the full $12 million state contribution to this federal plan?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-05-06">
            <name>Automotive Industry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-05-06T15:52:41" />
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000456">
          <timeStamp time="2014-05-06T15:52:41" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:52):</by>  Because they offered us more money. In fact, this is exactly the reason why you stand up and you fight against something which is inadequate. We held out because the first proposition was pathetically low. This, frankly, is still inadequate, but it does represent a starting point; it means that we can put something in the order of $100 million into this effort. We did ask for something in the order of $400 million over four years, but $100 million is a respectable start and there is no reason why we shouldn't get cracking. That's why we are prepared to do that.</text>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000457">Just consider what the federal government has actually saved through no longer involving themselves in automotive assistance—about $1.3 billion of savings has been made as a consequence of them no longer providing support to the car industry in this country. Now, the notion that only $100 million should be provided—less than that; most of the $100 million actually comes from us: our 60 and their (in the order of) 40. The fact that they are only putting in such a paltry sum, given the amount that they are actually saving, I think—</text>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000458">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000459">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It's a start. I'm not going to turn my nose up at 40—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000460">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  It's a paltry start!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000461">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  You only need to look at those numbers—$1.3 billion and we're—</text>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000462">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000463">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I'm not going to turn my nose up at $40 million, frankly. I'll grab that and we'll continue to fight it. But this is what you do when you stand up and fight for your state. You have to know when to fight and when to talk—</text>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000464">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000465">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I wouldn't roll over and have my tummy tickled. But what I was prepared to do was to stand up and ensure that we got a better deal for South Australia. Now, there is much more to be done. I did raise with the Prime Minister at the Council of Australian Governments meeting just last Friday that I believe that the Federal Government had—what is that actually doing? How much longer have I got?</text>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000466">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000467">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Oh, I see. I did raise with the Prime Minister that what occurred to me was a lack of urgency and a lack of adequacy in the response that was actually being made by the commonwealth. He assured me that there would be a further response to South Australia. That is quite unnerving, sir, I must say. That is quite an unnerving—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000468">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Both black dots go anticlockwise.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000469">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I think this is a very subtle mind game that is being played by the opposition seeking to unnerve the speaker.</text>
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000470">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="14" />
        <text id="20140506e150f9185b5c4b3ba0000471">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  What an extraordinary thing! Anyway, I will try and keep my focus, but the commonwealth government through the Prime Minister has offered more. He believes that there will be a further response on the way. There will need to be, because the scale of the challenge in front of us is significant, but $100 million, or at least the commonwealth's $40 million as we understand it, is a respectable start and we will get on with the work.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>