<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8041" />
  <endPage num="8126" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>APY Lands, Court Circuits</name>
      <text id="20131128428c5d38ea924eb7a0000778">
        <heading>APY LANDS, COURT CIRCUITS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-28">
            <name>APY LANDS, COURT CIRCUITS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-28T15:41:00" />
        <text id="20131128428c5d38ea924eb7a0000779">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-28T15:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (15:41):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Can the Attorney explain why funding for court circuits on the APY lands has been cut by 25 per cent, despite the Mullighan inquiry recommendation 45 that APY lands residents need efficient and reliable access to justice?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-28">
            <name>APY LANDS, COURT CIRCUITS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-28T15:41:00" />
        <text id="20131128428c5d38ea924eb7a0000780">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-28T15:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:41):</by>  I thank the Leader of the Opposition for that question. I am not actually aware of whether or not the fact upon which the question is based is in fact a fact or simply an assertion. I would need to check that, but I can say that there are some—</text>
        <text id="20131128428c5d38ea924eb7a0000781">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131128428c5d38ea924eb7a0000782">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I will get back to the house shortly about it. But if you do want me to do my best in answering, I can say that there are a number of things which are within the control of the Courts Administration Authority and not within the control of the state government, and that includes a whole range of things, including circuits. Obviously I take the question seriously and I will get back to the house in May or thereabouts.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>