<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7883" />
  <endPage num="7971" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
      <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000888">
        <heading>GOODS AND SERVICES TAX</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T15:37:00" />
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000889">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T15:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (15:37):</by>  I may not use my full five minutes today to grieve—</text>
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000890">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="60">Ms Thompson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000891">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  —which is disappointing for the member for Reynella, I know. I just wanted to place on the record and bring to the house's attention the falseness of the Premier's answer today in question time regarding the meeting tomorrow of treasurers in regard to GST. Anyone listening to the answer would have thought that tomorrow's meeting of the treasurers about a number of matters, including GST, was going to talk about lifting the rate or putting the GST on other services such as food, health or education, because that is what the Premier spent his allocated time answering the question about. It was nothing more than a shabby attempt at a scare campaign about the GST matter.</text>
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000892">I invite the media to seek out the treasurers attending tomorrow's meeting and ask them what item regarding the GST is on tomorrow's Treasury meeting. The advice to me is that the only matter on the agenda tomorrow of the treasurers regarding the GST is the question about whether the threshold on overseas sales should be lowered—nothing about food, nothing about health, nothing about education, nothing about increasing the rate.</text>
        <page num="7952" />
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000893">The Premier has come in here to the house and given, in my view, a false impression about what is going to be debated tomorrow. He ran the line that all these coalition governments were lining up at tomorrow's meeting to push through or advocate some reform which the Premier does not support. The truth of the matter is that the advice to me is that that is not happening and that suggestion is simply untrue. I invite the media to ring the treasurers' offices around Australia—and there are six or seven of them—and ask them what is on the agenda tomorrow in relation to the GST.</text>
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000894">Now, what is interesting is that the <term>Financial Review</term> today actually reports this, and if anyone goes to page 3 of today's <term>Financial Review</term> there is a full article on the matter that is going to be discussed tomorrow by the treasurers at the treasurers' meeting. The headline is 'Pressure grows to expand online GST'. And what does it say? It says in the second paragraph:</text>
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000895">
          <inserted>Ahead of the meetings of treasurers in Canberra on Wednesday, South Australian Labor Premier and Treasurer, Jay Weatherill, indicated his preparedness to support the move for change which is being led by New South Wales.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000896">What that indicates is that the treasurers are on the same page. The treasurers are on the same page in relation to that GST reform, so I invite the media, if you want to see a shabby scare campaign by a desperate Premier weeks out from a state election, to have a look at his answer today. If you want to prove that his answer is nothing but a scare campaign, ring any treasurer's office in Australia and they will confirm that the reality is the only matter on the agenda tomorrow regarding GST is a matter for which South Australian Treasurer and Mr Premier is going to support.</text>
        <text id="201311263b2f145e1c9a439790000897">His whole answer was fabricated around the issue that tomorrow there is a treasurers' meeting and the GST is going to be discussed and there is some conservative or Coalition plan going to be hatched at this meeting. The evidence is that that is untrue and I think the media need to go to the Premier and ask him on what basis did he suggest the rate—the extension of it to food, health and education—was going to be discussed tomorrow when it is not even on the agenda.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>