<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7883" />
  <endPage num="7971" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
      <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000817">
        <heading>GOODS AND SERVICES TAX</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="539" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.W. KEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ashford</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>GOODS AND SERVICES TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T15:17:00" />
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000818">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="539">The Hon. S.W. KEY (Ashford) (15:17):</by>  My question is directed to the Premier. I am wondering whether the Premier can advise the house on the recent national discussions on the goods and services tax.</text>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000819">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000820">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The member for Bragg is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T15:17:00" />
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000821">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (15:17):</by>  Members would be aware that in the media yesterday there was speculation that tomorrow's meeting of the Standing Council for Federal Financial Relations (once known as the treasurers' conference) would be contemplating changes to the GST. This continues to be the noise that emerges from Coalition governments in the Eastern States: that the GST should be broadened to cover food, health and education, or that the rate should be increased, or that the process of allocating the GST between the states, known as horizontal fiscal equalisation, would be altered.</text>
        <page num="7947" />
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000822">These changes are completely unacceptable to this government. We will never stand for a GST to be extended to food, health or education services or the rate to be increased, nor will we permit the HFE arrangements to be thrown away. To do so would hurt households already doing it tough across the nation. I also note that these ideas are advanced at the same time as relieving burdens on businesses. So, it's a direct take out of the pockets of householders into the pockets of businesspeople, and it's something that we will not stand for.</text>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000823">When the federal Liberal government introduced the GST, they originally intended it to apply to everything, including fresh food. With the new Liberal government, we see all of the conservatives across the nation lining up to finish the job, and all they want is another ally. All they want is another ally over here. They want to put the GST on everything, including fresh food, and they want to make people pay more tax.</text>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000824">Just this week, we have seen Liberal premiers and treasurers interstate talking about jacking up the GST or broadening the base, and these have not been isolated instances. They came in response to an invitation by the current federal Treasurer back in July, when he said, 'If you are going to have a discussion about changing the GST, the states have to lead the argument because they are the ones that need the revenue.' So, this is an operation, this is a manoeuvre, getting the conservative states—hoping to have another mate over there—to join the chorus, to soften up the Australian community for an increase in taxation.</text>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000825">Premier O'Farrell responded on cue. He came out suggesting that we should increase the GST. We know that if you want to increase the GST there are only two ways to do it: you either jack up the rate or you take away exemptions. We all know the biggest exemption is on fresh food. So they either want to jack up the rate or extend it to fresh food or have a look at the other exemptions.</text>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000826">The two other big exemptions are health and education services. This Labor government will never support an increase in the rate of the GST or broadening its base. During all of this debate about the GST, the South Australian Liberals have remained mute and very suspiciously quiet, I might say. Make no mistake: if elected, they will roll over and allow the Coalition to—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000827">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker. Surely, sir, this is debate now.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311261fa9a170d77d4a1280000828">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes, it is debate. We will move on to the deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>