<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7883" />
  <endPage num="7971" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Spent Convictions</name>
      <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000804">
        <heading>SPENT CONVICTIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2819" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.B. SUCH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Fisher</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>SPENT CONVICTIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T15:13:00" />
        <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000805">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2819">The Hon. R.B. SUCH (Fisher) (15:13):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Can the Attorney ascertain why the spent convictions legislation appears not to be fully implemented? I have had two people contact me in the last week, both relating to minor larceny offences—one 43 years ago and the other 14 years ago—which are still on their police clearance certificate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>SPENT CONVICTIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T15:13:00" />
        <page num="7946" />
        <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000806">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:13):</by>  I thank the member for Fisher for his question. As members would know, he has had a longstanding interest in this particular area of the law and has spent some time moving matters in this place. He has also written to me regularly about these matters, so I do appreciate his interest in the matter. As the member would appreciate, there have been some changes in the not too distant past to the spent convictions legislation which were designed to deal with the perceived anomalies—</text>
        <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000807">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000808">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The member for Chaffey is called to order. The member for Heysen is warned for the second and final time, and we would not want to see petrol prices cause her eviction for the second sitting day in a row.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000809">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Can I say that I would be very happy to look at the particular matters to which the member refers and see whether there has been any obvious difficulty in relation to the application of the law in those matters or whether the law itself needs further modification. I would be happy to look at those matters.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131126df8af745110f4d10b0000810">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>