<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7883" />
  <endPage num="7971" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Superannuation Benefits</name>
      <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000735">
        <heading>SUPERANNUATION BENEFITS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>SUPERANNUATION BENEFITS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T14:56:00" />
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000736">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna) (14:56):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Finance. What effect will the Abbott government's plan to scrap the low income superannuation contribution have on low paid workers in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>SUPERANNUATION BENEFITS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-26T14:56:00" />
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000737">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-26T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:56):</by>  Thank you, member for Kaurna. As members may be aware, the commonwealth government has announced its intention not to continue with the low income superannuation contribution. This government has gone to considerable effort in the past two years to establish a public sector scheme by which low paid public sector workers can benefit from the commonwealth's low income superannuation contribution scheme.</text>
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000738">In January this year, Super SA Select was established in line with the principles of the federal government's Cooper review into superannuation which sets out the future direction of superannuation schemes in Australia. Public sector employees who earn less than $37,000 a year could join Super SA Select and receive up to $500 per annum in superannuation payments without impacting on their living wage.</text>
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000739">I issued a media release on Thursday 10 January this year encouraging low paid public sector employees to join this new fund. The difference from the fund that we have and all other public sector employees have in that it is a constitutionally non-protected scheme, so that on the payment of pensions the pensions are taxed, unlike our scheme.</text>
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000740">This was a first for government. This government brought in Super SA Select because we recognised that an estimated 28,000 Super SA members would have missed out on this commonwealth payment, including many young workers and those working on a casual or part-time basis, because the commonwealth payment only applies to members of taxed superannuation schemes.</text>
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000741">These 28,000 low paid public sector workers are only a fraction of the total number of people who have been affected in South Australia by this cut. Supermarket cashiers, labourers and tradespeople working on our state's many construction projects, and cleaners in our schools and hospitals, will now be denied this superannuation benefit.</text>
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000742">Interestingly, concurrent with this announcement, the federal government also announced that it was going to ditch the tax that was going to be paid on superannuation pensions in excess of $100,000 per annum, so low paid workers were being penalised while high income pensioners being paid a pension in excess of $100,000 a year were actually being returned to non-tax status.</text>
        <text id="2013112661b2204e4119421380000743">So, on the one hand low income workers are being hit and on the other hand high income individuals are receiving a particular benefit. Now, this begs the question: where does the state opposition stand on this matter, because it does impact on a state government superannuation scheme, and what are they going to do about low paid workers in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>