<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7803" />
  <endPage num="7885" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Payroll Tax</name>
      <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000574">
        <heading>PAYROLL TAX</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-14">
            <name>PAYROLL TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-14T14:45:00" />
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000575">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-14T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:45):</by>  My question, Mr Speaker, is to the Minister for Small Business. Does the minister agree with the government's own Small Business Development Council's recommendation that the payroll tax threshold should be increased to $800,000 from its current level of $600,000 as the next step in reducing the payroll tax burden?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-14">
            <name>PAYROLL TAX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-14T14:46:00" />
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000576">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-14T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:46):</by>  Those are all matters for consideration in the context of any budget, and they certainly won't be matters that will be speculated upon by this government ahead of any decisions we might take. But can I say this: the current budget has baked into it two very significant payroll tax reductions over this year and next year, halving payroll tax for small businesses—not the confetti that has been thrown around by those opposite—to all businesses in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000577">This is a targeted scheme in partnership with targeted programs to get small businesses to invest, those small businesses that have a much higher capacity or indeed propensity to invest. The idea that somehow you would throw a generalised payroll tax relief across the whole of the sector, or indeed—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000578">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order, sir: this is debate, I believe.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000579">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Debate? It is a question about payroll tax. The member for Unley was interjecting after being warned a second time; he has now made an entirely bogus and obstructive point of order. If I see his lips move again out of order, I will name him. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000580">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. What we have in South Australia is, in terms of tax effort, the third lowest payroll tax regime in the nation. So, to pick on that as a taxation area for further reduction does seem to be odd, given our relative strong performance across the nation. But, just going to that, we have already made very targeted important relief, halving payroll tax for small businesses, petering out at $1.2 million in terms of payroll tax.</text>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000581">That is a sensible payroll tax measure, in partnership with banks, together with programs targeted at investment to ensure that there is growth. This seems to be at the heart of that suggestion, and indeed at the heart of the suggestions that those opposite have published in their pamphlet, or brochure, as you would have it—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. Snelling</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000582">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. Snelling:</by>  Flyer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000583">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —flyer—is to take essentially a bolus of money and hand it over to business in the hope that they would invest; whereas what we know is that when you hand over money in an untargeted fashion like that the more likely thing is that people will put it in their pockets. That's what would happen with this money. It would not flow down to ordinary South Australians in terms of jobs, or activity, or benefits; it would end up in the pockets of their business mates, and this is the difference between us and them.</text>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000584">This is the difference about how we construct public policy, not some ideological rant that we are going to get out of the way, or we are going to hand over a truckload of cash and hope that somehow the economy improves. It is about the intelligent design of policy—something which is utterly lost on the laziest opposition we have seen in the history of this parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000585">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> The last remarks were entirely out of order, and I call the Premier to order. The member for Davenport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000586">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. I hope Rik Morris can at least stop writing Mike Rann lines for the Premier, sir.</text>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000587">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000588">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  If you go back to the <term>Hansard</term>, sir, that is exactly the same line Kevin Foley used to use, but I will keep on with my question, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7845" />
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000589">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Well, if the member for Davenport doesn't want to ask a question, he may be seated.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000590">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  I shall be or may be?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201311147b588688063b4cec90000591">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> No, I will call the member for Ashford.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>