<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-11-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7645" />
  <endPage num="7731" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20131112d1dda35868e54c2490000617">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-12">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-12T14:26:00" />
        <text id="20131112d1dda35868e54c2490000618">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-12T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:26):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. As paragraph 536 of the Debelle report indicates that parents should be told if there is a possibility that children are at risk, does the government intend to notify parents of the allegations against the northern suburbs out-of-school-hours care worker?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-12">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-12T14:26:00" />
        <text id="20131112d1dda35868e54c2490000619">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-12T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:26):</by>  Mr Debelle also makes it very clear that you have to be very cautious about releasing information whilst investigations are ongoing, when you are in a situation where no charges or arrests have been made, and I understand that is the case currently. So, police are conducting an investigation and no charges or arrests have been laid in relation to this person and any allegations made about him. We are seeing, over recent days, where media outlets are choosing to name particular schools and visit particular schools before an investigation is complete, and we have been in the situation where, without naming a particular person, we have to put letters out to parents to allay their fears and assure them that proper processes are underway.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>