<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7479" />
  <endPage num="7571" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Budget</name>
      <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000760">
        <heading>HEALTH BUDGET</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-30">
            <name>HEALTH BUDGET</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-30T15:01:00" />
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000761">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-30T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (15:01):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health and Ageing. Can the minister confirm that one of his first—</text>
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000762">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="78">Mr Whetstone interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000763">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  I will just repeat that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7525" />
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000764">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Was that the member for Chaffey interjecting?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000765">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  No, he was assisting, sir. I will just start again.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000766">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I warn him for the second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000767">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  He was provoked, I am sure, by the other side, sir. Can the minister confirm that one of his first directives as minister was to order the end of the medical imaging IT project ESMI without receiving advice from his department, and did the minister have to reverse his decision when the department advised him it would cost $16 million if he proceeded with his directive?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-10-30T15:01:00" />
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000768">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-30T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (15:01):</by>  I will need to check my records but, certainly, when I took over the portfolio of Health, I had concerns about the scope of the IT projects which the Department for Health was undertaking. We've had significant investments: Oracle, of course, and EPAS. These are enormous reform tasks. The department also has IT projects with EPLIS and ESMI, and I had concerns about how much the department was biting off and whether it was a good idea for us to continue to pursue all those IT projects.</text>
        <text id="201310308cb07120fbe14bbc80000769">Certainly, I sought advice from my department about rescoping those projects and the potential to do so. My recollection is that the department's advice was that, because there had been certain recommendations from the Coroner about the Women's and Children's Hospital and their digital imagery or lack thereof, it would not be a good idea for us not to proceed with that—that was the advice I got. I don't recall making any directive not to proceed with any IT projects but, certainly, I did seek information from the department and queried the scope of the IT projects we were undertaking, which I think was only prudent.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>