<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7479" />
  <endPage num="7571" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Parliamentary Committees</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Works Committee: Ethelton Wastewater Pump Station Renewal Project</name>
      <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000095">
        <heading>PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE: ETHELTON WASTEWATER PUMP STATION RENEWAL PROJECT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4337" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr SIBBONS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-10-30T11:44:00" />
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000096">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-30T11:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4337">Mr SIBBONS (Mitchell) (11:44):</by>  Thank you, sir, and I hope this one is not as controversial as the last one. I move:</text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000097">
          <inserted>That the 487<sup>th</sup> report of the committee, entitled Ethelton Wastewater Pump Station Renewal Project, be noted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000098">The primary objective of the project is to maintain the current service standard of the network. In particular, the options developed seek to:</text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000099">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">meet original design life of structure;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000100">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">provide security for the existing sewerage network by providing sufficient pumping capacity to match design life of the structure;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000101">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">provide sufficient availability/reliability to meet criticality rating of the asset;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000102">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">ensure asset complies with current OH&amp;S and EPA regulation; and</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000103">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">implement an odour control plant.</item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000104">SA Water proposed that, due to its age, the infrastructure needed the following work:</text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000105">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">a mechanical and electrical upgrade for the existing building;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000106">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">construction of a new switchboard building;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000107">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">installation of an odour control plant to address odour issues;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000108">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">new driveway with new entry and exit point to Bower Road;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000109">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">new security fencing; and</item>
        </text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000110">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">site landscaping using native plants.</item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000111">The total project cost is $6.915 million. The project will address the key risks associated with the ongoing operation of the pump station. This shall provide security to the existing wastewater network, support future growth and development in the Lefevre Peninsula, meet OH&amp;S compliance and address odour related concerns from local residents. The project will be completed by January 2016. Given this and pursuant to section 12C of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1991, the Public Works Committee reports to parliament that it recommends the proposed public works.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-10-30T11:46:00" />
        <page num="7487" />
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000112">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-30T11:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (11:46):</by>  The opposition is delighted to support this motion. As my honourable friend has pointed out, it is critical work for a number of reasons. The existing mechanical and electrical infrastructure within the building is poor and it presents a high risk of network overflow. There is a history of odour concerns from local residents. There are a number of work health and safety-related concerns that exist with the operation of the old pump station, and to support future growth and development across Lefevre in line with the 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide, it will be needed.</text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000113">There is no-one who cares more about the needs of the west and the Port Adelaide area than those on this side of the house. That is why it is very important infrastructure. It is $7 million of the taxpayers' money, but I note that recent clean-out works within the wet well removed 27 tonnes of grit. Basically, this infrastructure is falling apart and it needs to be fixed. It probably should have been fixed sooner. If the state government was not in such a financial mess with the highest deficit we have ever had and extraordinary debt levels perhaps it would have been done sooner, but at least the project is now before us. We can get on with it and keep things flowing, as we say. With that, I support the motion.</text>
        <text id="2013103046635ec50b5543dda0000114">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>