<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7479" />
  <endPage num="7571" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000647">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australia Police</name>
      <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000648">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-30">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-30T14:31:00" />
        <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000649">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-30T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:31):</by>  My question is for the Premier. In light of the Premier's comment on 10 February, and I quote, 'There will be no cut to police numbers; in fact, police numbers will grow,' can the Premier explain why the SA Police annual report released yesterday shows that, compared to the previous year, there are 43 fewer sworn police officers on the beat, 54 fewer sworn and unsworn full-time equivalents, 178 fewer sworn police officers recruited, and 240 fewer sworn and unsworn FTEs recruited?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-30">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-30T14:32:00" />
        <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000650">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-30T14:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:32):</by>  I have been asked that question before, and I was given an explanation for what the answer is, and it is a good answer. It is a good answer, because I think it has been raised with me before. I think it is about when the snapshot is taken of police numbers. But the truth is that, over the period that we have given commitments to, police numbers will continue to grow. So not only do we have the highest number of police per capita, we will continue to recruit against attrition.</text>
        <page num="7517" />
        <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000651">There are, of course, periods when there are intakes that go into the academies and certain officers come out, so numbers fluctuate around those needs, but police numbers on average are increasing throughout the course of this period. They are, I think, 850 higher than when we came into office. They are the largest number of police per capita. We are always happy to have a discussion about police numbers, because on this it has been one of the great achievements of this state Labor government, crime rates having fallen by 40 per cent or so over the last 10 years. These are the sorts of services that would be in jeopardy if they came to office, those opposite, and implemented their 25,000 job cuts in the public sector.</text>
        <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000652">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013103035b5315c20514213b0000653">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Before a supplementary from the member for Stuart, I warn the member of the Chaffey for the first time and I call the member for Schubert to order. Member for Stuart.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>