<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7409" />
  <endPage num="7481" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Inner City Revitalisation</name>
      <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000419">
        <heading>INNER CITY REVITALISATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-29">
            <name>INNER CITY REVITALISATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-29T14:33:00" />
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000420">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-29T14:33:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:33):</by>  Given that the minister has outlined his claim that this announcement was so welcomed today by those in these communities, why then were Anzac Highway and Henley Beach Road, which sit in the electorates of Ashford and West Torrens, removed from the inner metropolitan rezoning changes that he announced today?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-29">
            <name>INNER CITY REVITALISATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-29T14:34:00" />
        <page num="7438" />
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000421">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-29T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:34):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. Just so it is very clear to everybody, this is not the only rezone that is—</text>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000422">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000423">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Can I please be able to answer the question? This is not the only rezone that is ever going to happen in the inner metropolitan area. This is the first rezone that is happening in the inner metropolitan area—the first. The situation, and the government has made no secret about this and I certainly have not, is that there will be more rezones in the inner city area. That is going to happen, no question about it, but it has to go through a process, and the process that it needs to go through is one where there is an appropriate engagement with the community, where the councils bring the communities along and where they have an opportunity to get involved.</text>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000424">As I explained, all of the rim councils, with the exception of one, willingly participated in the exercise we have just gone through, and what we have put in respect of those has been absolutely agreed to by them. Those who want to have a look at those plans will be able to ascertain that, as a result of the process and as a result of the consultation that has gone on, some areas have been excised altogether from those original plans, and they include areas in the honourable member's own electorate, I believe, where, because certain residents were not happy, bits have been taken out, for example, behind the Air Apartments.</text>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000425">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000426">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I beg your pardon; that's one for the member for Unley. I think the ones heading down Greenhill Road in Dulwich are the ones that the honourable member might be happier about. They have been removed and that's because we listen to people, and we will continue to do that.</text>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000427">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000428">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Adelaide is called to order. Is the Deputy Premier finished?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131029ca979bccc7e24c5880000429">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  No. So, we will continue to do that and in due course the areas to which the honourable member has referred will be considered and the communities there will be consulted.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>