<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7409" />
  <endPage num="7481" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000364">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Taxes and Charges</name>
      <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000365">
        <heading>TAXES AND CHARGES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-29">
            <name>TAXES AND CHARGES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-29T14:18:00" />
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000366">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-29T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:18):</by>  As a supplementary, given that the Premier used his time allocated to the last question to justify why we are the highest-taxed state in Australia, is he satisfied that that should remain the case going forward?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-29">
            <name>TAXES AND CHARGES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-29T14:19:00" />
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000367">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-29T14:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:19):</by>  I said nothing of the sort. Indeed, if one goes to the budget papers—in fact, on page 53 of the budget papers—in the per capita taxation by jurisdiction, you can see that South Australia ranks sixth amongst all of the states in terms of per capita taxation effort. It is quite opposite to the point that is being made by the Leader of the Opposition; in fact, the budget papers bear out a different proposition. We have chosen to make a very substantial relief in relation to our payroll tax; in fact, I think it is up to about $200 million. We are using the taxation rates that we had when we came into government, namely your taxation rates for payroll tax. We have given $200 million of taxation relief to the South Australian businesses of this state.</text>
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000368">In addition to that, because of the particular circumstances of the South Australian economy now, we provided an additional payroll tax relief targeted at small business—temporary, limited in duration—because we wanted to provide that additional impetus at a time when the small business community were crying out for that support. We did not do it in a mindless way. We added to it a series of other measures, which, together with that payroll tax relief, would allow businesses to change, to grow, to do new things in new ways, which are at the heart of the transformation for the South Australian economy.</text>
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000369">This is not just simply a matter of throwing money at businesses—large, small or enormous—which is what those opposite have chosen to do. They just simply have a cut across the board, which is poorly targeted, goes on for an extended period and, indeed, on my advice it exceeds well over $100 million of payroll tax relief over the forward estimates. There is not a word about how that would be paid for except to send it to some unelected body which nobody yet knows the composition of, and they will somehow get back to us after the next election telling us which services they will cut—utterly undemocratic, utterly unacceptable.</text>
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000370">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000371">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2013102903004a4063c4465490000372">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Leader, please be seated. Again, the Premier again has no responsibility for the policies of the opposition, and I ask him to circumscribe his answers on that point. I call the member for Unley to order for interjecting, and I warn the member for Heysen for the first time; she has barely paused for breath during the Premier's answers. Leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>