<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7269" />
  <endPage num="7349" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Inquiry</name>
      <text id="20131016c2d29db293084434b0000571">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-16">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-16T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20131016c2d29db293084434b0000572">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-16T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:56): </by> Supplementary. Premier: why, then, did cabinet get a briefing at all, given your statement that cabinet plays no role in parole submissions except for life sentences?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131016c2d29db293084434b0000573">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> That is not a supplementary. We will just treat it as another question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-10-16T14:57:00" />
        <page num="7309" />
        <text id="20131016c2d29db293084434b0000574">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-16T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (14:57): </by> Perhaps I will just go back and do this the long way. It was anticipated that, because this was a notorious matter—an awful assault with somebody being convicted and at some point a person would potentially have the capacity to be paroled—and, given that this was related to the matters that were the subject of the Debelle inquiry, it was anticipated by people assisting us to prepare to respond to the Debelle inquiry that somebody may ask the question, 'How does one make a representation in respect of parole?' A request was made to the Attorney-General's Department to provide advice so that we would be in a position to know the answer to that question.</text>
        <text id="20131016c2d29db293084434b0000575">As it happens, in the ordinary course, government does make representations—through the police and through Corrections—and then, on other occasions, if requested to by the Parole Board, other people can make representations but, ordinarily, it is a matter that is instigated by the Parole Board. We were then equipped to answer questions should somebody ask us about that. There was never any consideration for the cabinet or the government to be making its own representations in respect of a parole matter, or this parole matter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>