<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7269" />
  <endPage num="7349" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20131016c6dd22f0ffaa4c1780000485">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-16">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-16T14:33:00" />
        <page num="7303" />
        <text id="20131016c6dd22f0ffaa4c1780000486">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-16T14:33:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:33):</by>  Is the minister suggesting to the house that, even though this matter was raised with her on 30 September or 1 October, you have had no chance between then and now to review the original 2005 investigation into this absolutely appalling situation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131016c6dd22f0ffaa4c1780000487">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> If the Leader of the Opposition asks questions that are leading and loaded like that he can expect the kind of response from ministers to which the opposition was objecting just a few minutes ago. The Minister for Education.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-10-16T14:33:00" />
        <text id="20131016c6dd22f0ffaa4c1780000488">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-16T14:33:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:33):</by>  The focus of the correspondence that was originally received was that the young man was very concerned that the confidentiality agreement was in place and that he had some issues that he wanted to raise. He wanted an assurance that he would not be breaching that confidentiality agreement or in some way getting himself into trouble. So, having received that request, my chief of staff immediately actioned requests to the department to source information and get some legal advice for this young man. That work has been underway over the last two weeks.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>