<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7199" />
  <endPage num="7271" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20131015d27e98a3a46b4a03a0000584">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-15">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-15T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20131015d27e98a3a46b4a03a0000585">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-15T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:46):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Prior to 24 September, did the minister receive a written briefing about this matter, as the mother claims she was told by the minister's office?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-15">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-15T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20131015d27e98a3a46b4a03a0000586">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-15T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:46):</by>  When we received the correspondence from the mother that was dated 26 May, we did a number of things. We referred the most urgent matter, obviously, off to the Minister for Police, and that was in relation to the concern that the matter hadn't progressed and that the alleged perpetrator hadn't been charged, and there was some concern that the police had indicated some concern that it may not make it through the court processes.</text>
        <text id="20131015d27e98a3a46b4a03a0000587">So, that was the priority but, obviously, information was also sought from the department in relation to the actions of the school. But, also, information was sought about the mandatory reporting requirements of the department. There was a question seeking contact details for the manager of the grievances department. Those two issues were complied with by the Parent Complaint Unit.</text>
        <page num="7241" />
        <text id="20131015d27e98a3a46b4a03a0000588">There was also concern expressed about the delay in being able to lodge a report on the Child Abuse Report Line. That information came into my office, and I have since written to the family and apologised, outlining why there were delays and what we are doing to address that that piece of information wasn't passed on to them. But let me just say that the very important issue about this matter going to court and the concerns of the parents were dealt with the very next day.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20131015d27e98a3a46b4a03a0000589">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>