<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7199" />
  <endPage num="7271" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20131015e75383745e3b486890000565">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-15">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-15T14:41:00" />
        <text id="20131015e75383745e3b486890000566">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-15T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:41):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Did any of her ministerial advisers call the mother of the girl who was allegedly assaulted at the southern suburbs school on 1 July just prior to the release of the Debelle inquiry to advise that the alleged sexual assault case was to be investigated?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-10-15">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-10-15T14:41:00" />
        <text id="20131015e75383745e3b486890000567">
          <timeStamp time="2013-10-15T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:41):</by>  I understand there was a conversation on 1 July and I think that was in relation to a follow-up email that was received from the mother over the weekend some time, so it was 1 July. Can I also advise the house I have checked in relation to contact with the family and I understand the CE advised the lawyers that have been engaged by the family that the matter had been referred to the Ombudsman, so I understand that it was the request of the lawyers that all of those matters go through them, so the CE undertook that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>