<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6957" />
  <endPage num="7055" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Inquiry</name>
      <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000584">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-24">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-24T15:32:00" />
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000585">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-24T15:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (15:32):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can the Premier assure the house that none of his ministerial staff have had any discussion with the CEO of the education department or any of the CEO's legal advisers about the issue of possible penalties for public servants arising from the Debelle inquiry?</text>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000586">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000587">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes, can we have that again, because I am not sure that I follow it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000588">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  I am happy to do it again, sir. Can the Premier assure the house that none of his ministerial staff have had any discussion with the CEO of the education department or any of the CEO's legal advisers about the issue of possible penalties for public servants arising from the Debelle inquiry?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000589">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> Okay, that's clear, thank you.</text>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000590">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="44">Mr Pengilly interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000591">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by> I call the member for Finniss to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-09-24T15:33:00" />
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000592">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-24T15:33:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts) (15:33):</by>  I understand the question to be: have members of my staff sought to ascertain what the situation may be in relation to disciplinary action in relation to staff members of the education department? I don't know the answer to that question, but if they are making inquiries about that matter I would have thought it is pretty natural.</text>
        <text id="20130924c43e2ee7e9c6429b80000593">It has been a matter of some regular comment and interest by those opposite and the general community about what the fate of those disciplinary matters are, and we are awaiting and looking forward to the outcome of those matters. Indeed, I think those opposite have been regularly inquiring about these matters, as has the minister's office, and we are awaiting, of course, the chief executive's deliberations, which are entirely matters for him.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>