<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6957" />
  <endPage num="7055" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Da Vinci Surgical Robot</name>
      <text id="20130924b110b0d355b145d4a0000455">
        <heading>DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2819" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.B. SUCH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Fisher</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-24">
            <name>DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-24T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20130924b110b0d355b145d4a0000456">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-24T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2819">The Hon. R.B. SUCH (Fisher) (14:57):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Can the minister indicate whether the new Da Vinci robot will still be available for public patients requiring prostatic surgery and others who need specialised laparoscopic surgery?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-24">
            <name>DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-24T14:58:00" />
        <page num="6990" />
        <text id="20130924b110b0d355b145d4a0000457">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-24T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (14:58):</by>  The short answer is yes. We have entered into an arrangement with St Andrew's Hospital for public patients—the same number of public patients who are currently using the machine at the Royal Adelaide—to be able to continue to access the machine at St Andrew's Hospital, including overnight stays. If there are complications with the surgery and those patients require a longer stay, then they will be transferred back to the Royal Adelaide but, generally speaking, it would be an overnight stay and that will happen at St Andrew's—that will be done on a fee-for-service basis.</text>
        <text id="20130924b110b0d355b145d4a0000458">Under the arrangement of the contract that we have with St Andrew's, for St Andrew's to have the business case to go and purchase the machine, we had to provide them with a minimum number of patients that we would pay for—public patients who would use the machine. That's 120, but I would suspect that it will be much larger than 120. At the announcement on Sunday, we had the clinical leads for ENT, gynaecology and urology from the Royal Adelaide. They are, of course, incredibly supportive of this arrangement we have with St Andrew's and spoke very glowingly. Importantly, these arrangements with St Andrew's will allow registrars in those areas to be able to be trained in using the Da Vinci machine.</text>
        <text id="20130924b110b0d355b145d4a0000459">We will see how it goes. It's a three-year arrangement with St Andrew's, with a right of renewal at the end of that. If demand for the machine continues to grow and there is a business case for us having a machine full-time located in a public hospital for exclusive public use, then that is something that we will consider. I would think there is probably a reasonably good chance that we would end up acquiring one for the new Royal Adelaide Hospital, but for the next three years we have an arrangement with St Andrew's for public patients to access the machine. It is a fantastic collaboration between the private hospital sector and the public health sector which will bring enormous benefits to public patients who can access this fantastic technology.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>