<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6957" />
  <endPage num="7055" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000427">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000428">
        <heading>CHILD PROTECTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-24">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-24T14:51:00" />
        <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000429">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-24T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:51):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. When was a complaint first lodged with the department against a teacher at a southern suburbs school for failing to comply with mandatory reporting obligations in relation to the alleged sexual assault of a 13-year-old girl by a year 12 student attending the same school, and has an investigation into these allegations been undertaken?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-24">
            <name>CHILD PROTECTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-24T14:52:00" />
        <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000430">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-24T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:52):</by>  What I can inform the house is that in 2010 five female students were interviewed by staff of a southern suburbs school in relation to a matter that at the time was deemed to be sexual harassment. The school made that assessment and teachers are trained—</text>
        <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000431">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000432">
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE:</by>  I'm sorry? Teachers undergo mandatory training in relation to these matters and my understanding is that, on the information they had at the time, they made the assessment that it was a harassment issue. The person who was the subject of this was suspended from school and the reports that were accessed from the school indicated that parents were contacted as a result of those incidents.</text>
        <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000433">I now understand that in March of this year, the family approached police, making allegations about the incident in 2010 as well as another incident that occurred in 2011. There is no record, as I understand it, of the school being advised about the 2011 incident and my understanding also is that the perpetrator was no longer at the school.</text>
        <text id="20130924f05b107c73994d6590000434">The department was contacted, I understand—teachers were interviewed by SAPOL as a result and provided what information they had. SAPOL interviewed the other students involved and I understand that no further charges have been laid in relation to those interviews and that there was an arrest made in May of this year as a result of the police investigation.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>