<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6781" />
  <endPage num="6878" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>State Records</name>
      <text id="2013091176672fede3e7430980000774">
        <heading>STATE RECORDS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-11">
            <name>STATE RECORDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-11T14:49:00" />
        <text id="2013091176672fede3e7430980000775">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-11T14:49:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:49):</by>  My question is to the Premier. If the office of the former education minister (the member for Cheltenham) did not fill out the Intention to Destroy Records Report (ITDRR), is it the case that all records, including the recipient of the email sent by Mr Simon Blewett, are still held by Telstra?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-11">
            <name>STATE RECORDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-11T14:49:00" />
        <text id="2013091176672fede3e7430980000776">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-11T14:49:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:49):</by>  Again, the question has the problem that I have tried to identify in previous answers in that there are certain assumptions contained within the question itself, those being about there being 'official records'. That is a moot point, and I do not wish to proceed answering the question without making the point that that itself is a question that is contentious.</text>
        <text id="2013091176672fede3e7430980000777">As to the issue about Telstra, as the leader would know, there is a process by Telstra. I think the terminology used by Mr Ryan was that 'sample snapshots' of data are held within government agencies from time to time. That government data is held by Telstra for a period of time, and then later snapshots are taken. Whether that data constitutes an official record or not is indeed a different question, but yes, there is an involvement with Telstra; yes, they do hold the data for a period of time.</text>
        <page num="6826" />
        <text id="2013091176672fede3e7430980000778">I think for the sake of completeness I should say that Mr Ryan advised us this morning that, in his view, that is not the best way of recording data, if indeed data is an official record, which is the question that is at the core of all of this. A better alternative would be, in the event of it being an official record, that hard copies were retained or a specific data management system, such as TRIM or one of the other systems that are around the place, be utilised as the repository for the material.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>