<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6781" />
  <endPage num="6878" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>State Records</name>
      <text id="20130911cf1ba8da59854216b0000723">
        <heading>STATE RECORDS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-11">
            <name>STATE RECORDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-11T14:35:00" />
        <text id="20130911cf1ba8da59854216b0000724">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-11T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:35):</by>  This is supplementary to that. So, you're saying that, if that is wiped, they would need to get approval from the Director of State Records to destroy those same records?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-11">
            <name>STATE RECORDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-11T14:36:00" />
        <text id="20130911cf1ba8da59854216b0000725">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-11T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:36):</by>  No, I'm not saying that at all. It basically works like this: under the State Records Act, there are some things which are deemed to be a state record and there are some things that are not. So, that is the first dividing line: is it a state record or is it not? Then, beyond that, if it is a state record, not all state records are required to be held permanently. Some records are required to be held for a short period, and then there are five-year periods and so on. So, there are varying periods of retention required.</text>
        <text id="20130911cf1ba8da59854216b0000726">There is a destruction schedule, which is document 18 (I can't remember the acronym for it, but the leader knows what I am talking about), and that document is a document which is prepared in consultation with the State Records people, and it prescribes the circumstances in which material may be destroyed. Because a machine is wiped does not mean necessarily that the material is destroyed, because the material may be removed from the machine, placed in a storage facility of some description, whether that is hard copy or hard drives, or whatever it might be, and then the destruction of the hard drive occurs. I think that it is important for the parliament to understand: the mere destruction of a memory on a computer does not in and of itself indicate that there has been a destruction of an official record.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>