<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6781" />
  <endPage num="6878" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>State Records</name>
      <text id="201309114e71526cdf8c43d8b0000709">
        <heading>STATE RECORDS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-11">
            <name>STATE RECORDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-11T14:31:00" />
        <text id="201309114e71526cdf8c43d8b0000710">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-11T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Norwood—Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201309114e71526cdf8c43d8b0000711">
          <by role="member" id="531">The SPEAKER: </by>  Supplementary from the leader.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201309114e71526cdf8c43d8b0000712">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  In the Attorney's answer, when he outlined the terms of reference for the Moss Review, there was nothing in those terms of reference which dealt with the substance of the question, which essentially was, with these 100 agencies which have outstanding action plans for non-compliance or areas or concern or whatever you want to call it, there is going to be no verification that there has been any corrective action taken at any of those agencies until 2014.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-09-11T14:32:00" />
        <text id="201309114e71526cdf8c43d8b0000713">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-11T14:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:32):</by>  Actually I was answering your last question. That was the question before the last question but I am happy to answer that. As far as I am concerned, Mr Moss should be looking at these things. As I said, I issued the invitation to the opposition to speak with Mr Moss, and I actually do not disagree with the Leader of the Opposition that it would be useful for that 2014 timeline to be brought forward.</text>
        <text id="201309114e71526cdf8c43d8b0000714">To the extent that it is possible for State Records to do that, fine, but Mr Moss is not State Records, and he is not an auditor. So, I am happy to have that moved forward as quickly as it possibly can be, but Mr Moss's job is basically to look at whether the legislative framework is adequate and whether it is working. I think it is fairly clear that the government by commissioning this report by Mr Moss is saying as clearly as we can to the public and to the opposition, 'We think it could be better and that is why we are asking him to do it.'</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>