<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2013-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6701" />
  <endPage num="6783" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Riverland Indigenous Health Services</name>
      <text id="2013091069d42713eab94c9ab0000905">
        <heading>RIVERLAND INDIGENOUS HEALTH SERVICES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4339" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WHETSTONE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Chaffey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-10">
            <name>RIVERLAND INDIGENOUS HEALTH SERVICES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-10T17:01:00" />
        <text id="2013091069d42713eab94c9ab0000906">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-10T17:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4339">Mr WHETSTONE (Chaffey) (17:01):</by>  Given the minister's answer that he was unable to find suitable staff to carry out the funding, did the minister personally consult with the Riverland Division of General Practice before that decision?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-10">
            <name>RIVERLAND INDIGENOUS HEALTH SERVICES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-10T17:02:00" />
        <text id="2013091069d42713eab94c9ab0000907">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-10T17:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (17:02):</by>  No, I did not. I do not go out and personally consult with everything that goes on within my department, but I think the member for Chaffey is confusing two things. I think he is confusing the first part of the program, which was the audit, on which I think the Riverland general practice might have something to say, and the simple fact is that, with regard to their particular issue, that funding was always expected to be time limited. It always had an end date. It was a specific project for an audit of medical records in GP clinics to ascertain health outcomes for Aboriginal people. It was always time limited.</text>
        <text id="2013091069d42713eab94c9ab0000908">With regard to the second element, I do not think that would have had much to do with the Riverland general practice. I am open to correction. I need to check the advice from my department, but that was a specific program for which we needed to recruit workers in order to deliver the service. We advertised, and I think there might have been several rounds of advertising to try to recruit suitable staff, and the department was not able to do that. That does not mean that that money has just been pocketed. That money has been diverted into other areas of Aboriginal health where we think it can be better used.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>